|Photo: Sergey Shpakovsky|
That said, the ability to let thoughts mull and recombine for a while is an often-underappreciated privilege in the Web age and one for which I remain thankful, but which is valuable only up to a point. It's wonderful to be able to mull over a consideration for an extended period of time, but thinking about something for too long can be counterproductive - which is why I just binned a massive two-part magnum-opus-in-progress about what we saw back at Geneva, as my concerns about how everything introduced there relates to technology and driving and humanity was rapidly facing a complete logical unraveling. Plus, have to clear the boards before the local show later this week. Wish I could have scored a press pass, but wasn't even sure I'd be here for it until about this past Thursday.
Anyway, in place of those two encyclicals, quick notes on what was important a month ago:
- The McLaren P1 is technically intriguing, although it somehow seems overdone and strangely irrelevant and to me is less desirable than the MP4/12C. Could partially be my personal issues with the hybrid thing.
- The LaFerrari is much the same except with a greater historical burden and a far worse name.
- I wish the Rolls-Royce Wraith had lived up to the teaser images. The world needs a great grand motorcar; it also needs said motorcar to be styled alluringly.
- The Lamborghini Veneno is nothing but a pure and complete Lamborghini - it could be nothing but a Lamborghini - and thank almighty God for that, even if they're only building three of the damned things.
- I'm actually okay with the 991 911 GT3 being PDK-only. The loss in connectedness is marginal, it's in step with a broad movement, and once you get to seven gears I think I prefer a less fussy way of shifting anyway. Bigger worry: A 911 with messed-up steering feel is just classically wrong. Still want one, though.
- I am not surprised that the one car that won unanimous praise from the scribblers was the Golf GTD. Not that writers have all that much real influence - as indicated by the multitude of diesel AWD wagons with manual transmissions on the American road - but it really does seem like the Complete Solution.
First thing to know: New Yorkers don't hate cars. There is no end of personal transportation present in the everyday, and in many cases cars and SUVs and the like get used just like they get used in every burg and suburb in the rest of the country. This is especially the case in Queens and the Bronx.
Even so, cars in NYC suffer an accelerated entropy hard to duplicate elsewhere. The vehicular environment - the parking situation, the road conditions, the nature of traffic - is just harsh. Cars don't last much longer than ten years here. Theft isn't the massive issue that it was years ago, but my friend who used to own a Fox Mustang will attest to the fact that it's still a reality. The costs and risks of parking alone are enough to dissuade many from ownership; for the rest of us, the near-necessity of real bumpers means that some hardcore favorites (Alfa 105 GTV, Lotus Elise) are much less appealing than they would be elsewhere.
Past that, the mix on the road is a bit different; we don't have many pickup trucks, for example. We do have plenty of SUVs. There are preferences - when I worked for two (miserable) months at a local dealership back in 2009, the two most common requests from people entering the used car lot were for a Charger or an Altima.
You would think that Subarus would do well here: tough, capable of handling our increasingly ridiculous weather, relatively affordable, profoundly reliable (WRX/STi head gasket issues slipped under the rug for the moment). They don't exist in numbers. You will see two dozen Camrys before you see two Subarus.
The lot experience and the Subaru shortage point up some huge truths about cars here: the great majority of buyers tend to be very trendy and selfconscious, they go for the most predictable options, they don't stray too far from self-reinforcing socially acceptable choices.
The tendency for those of means to buy mostly to impress others and fit within accepted codes is reflected in the hegemony of the three big German sedan and CUV makers and the paucity of anything classic or sporty or remotely eccentric. Yes, one can see the occasional Italian exotic, but given the amount of money that floats around the dull predictability of high-end traffic in its logo-obsessed insecurity is a bit depressing. People buy to be seen, seeking a sort of bland "I have money and acceptable tastes" approval. Or else they just completely lack individuality and character. Maybe it's the same thing.
|About what you can expect here. Photo: Raging Wire|
The sad mutation process that took the city's art and bohemian culture scenes and converted them into hipster fashion-show zones showed a lot of the once-significant weird-car love there to be a recessive trait. Occasionally you'll see something interesting in Williamsburg or south of 14th Street, but I suspect that unless it's something really impressive that it just might be another case of ironic-pose-centric accessorization, too.
So, again, it's not that people here hate cars. It's that they mean something different, something far removed from classical ideas of backroad driving or cross-country running. A car or CUV or whatever is, too often, another boutique shopping bag, a clothing logo, a lifestyle statement - and that's about it. It's a bit depressing, but we live with it.
Maybe it's just that those of us here who understand just aren't in a place to fight back against the trendiness and dreariness often enough. But the belief does exist; resistance to that status quo gets lots of love. Dear God, you should see people react to Raphael's Baja Bug like it's the highlight of their day.
Maybe it's not an attitude that one sees day-to-day, but people here do understand.